Acid Reflux and H pylori
The test and treat approach of eradicating Helicobacter pylori
infections in all patients with gastro-esophageal reflux disease was at the
heart of a number of presentations at the annual Digestive Disease Week.
According to Dr. Robert Stuart of the Glasgow (Scotland) Royal
Infirmary, the new data are decidedly in favor of eradication. "Out of the 12
studies on this subject presented this year [at the meeting], 9 suggest that
eradication of H. pylori does not cause gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)
or dyspepsia to get worse but, instead, may be beneficial."
Dr. Stuart conducted one of these studies on an H. pylori test
and treat strategy. The patients were on maintenance therapy and had either
uninvestigated heartburn (204 patients), or they had endoscopy-positive
esophagitis (267 patients). Maintenance therapy was defined as at least three or
more prescriptions a year for proton pump inhibitors or therapy with
[H.sub.2]-receptor antagonists.
Patients were evaluated before starting therapy for H. pylori eradication and 6
months later using a standardized symptom scale, the Glasgow Dyspepsia Severity
Score. A significant change was defined as a difference of three or more points.
Of those whose H. pylori was successfully eradicated, 32% experienced a
significant change in their scores. Of those whose infections were not
eradicated, 22% had a significant change in scores. Also, 35% of the heartburn
patients whose H. pylori was eradicated and 15% of those who were still infected
were off drug therapy 1 year later.
H. pylori eradication also was associated with higher rates of symptom
improvement and drug therapy discontinuation 1 year later. Patients with
esophagitis and eradicated H. pylori did not benefit as much as did those with
heartburn. However, H. pylori eradication did not adversely affect the patients
and reduced prescribing costs 1 year later, he said.
Dr. Stuart's test and treatment assessment was part of a larger randomized,
controlled trial of H. pylori eradication in dyspepsia patients who also were on
maintenance therapy. That study also indicated that H. pylori eradication,
irrespective of the patient's underlying diagnosis, significantly improved
symptom and quality of life scores and reduced prescribing in a large dyspeptic
population on maintenance acid suppression.
Patients in that study were randomized to active treatment and control groups.
Patients given active treatment were analyzed by diagnosis--29% had endoscopy-confirmed
ulcers, 44% had endoscopy-confirmed nonulcer disease, and 27% had not undergone
endoscopy [[blank].sup.13]C-urea breath tests were positive in 52% of 937
patients; infection was successfully eradicated in 80%. Another study presented
at the meeting came to the conclusion that "gastric infection with H. pylori
seems to protect against the development of GERD symptoms."
Dr. Hector Cardona of the National University of Columbia, Bogota, qualified,
however, that this finding did not extend to those with severe erosive
complications of GERD, induding Barrett's esophagus. In the study, 348 GERD
patients were tested for H. pylori infection, underwent an upper GI endoscopy,
and completed a questionnaire about the frequency and duration of their GERD
symptoms. H. pylori- negative patients had more GERD symptoms than H.
pylori-positive ones.
Dr. Cardona did not differentiate the strains of H. pylori among the study
participants. Audience members suggested that a low proportion of CagA
infections, which are associated with more severe symptoms, may have accounted
for the disparity.
COPYRIGHT 2001 International Medical News Group
Links to other useful web-sites |
|
| |